Let's put aside the question if there is such a thing as the evolution of the consciousness of mankind or not.
There is a tendency in the man's evolution totally opposite to the diversifying universe, namely in the direction toward stillness from the movement.
If we make rough classification of human according to the corresponding chakra system, it would be in one of six types based on where the center of gravity of consciousness is located.
Thus the human "evolution" shift through physical activity to emotional, and finally mental, and come to stop the thought after passing the question about mental activity itself.
The way from the movement to the stillness, if we summarize, this is the journey in the direction of the enlightenment.
There seems to be a deviation in the feeling of "subjectivity" for each person. I thought for the long time that the "subjectivity" is recognized as the "awareness as the observer" by everyone. But I have realized that it was an error. I thought that everybody has the self-recognition of "the core of fluent awareness" in oneself, which is not originally, truly influenced by the content of the thought or the experience. But I've understood that the feeling of the subjectivity, "the thing with which a man get, remember the sensation of Who I Am" varies depending on the chakra where one's center of gravity is based upon.
The self-recognition of "subjectivity" for a given person differs according to the location of the physical center where one's "concentrated attention" has been repeatedly placed upon, in other words, where one's focus of attention has been pulled.
And at this fifth state, there is a problem one does not have at other states, first to fourth. At four other states, there is a solid object of the attention, namely physical body, emotion, memory, thought, which can all taken as an object.
Thus one can reflect these on self to recognize as the subjectivity of the self.
But "the subjectivity of the awareness, the one who is aware" at the fifth state cannot be an object, and that creates the problem.
Despite of that, he takes firmly that the awareness is his pure subjectivity, in his "thought", even though it can never be a recognition with solid sensation, sadly.
And if he start to search the subjectivity of the awareness eagerly, he would find only the void as something that can be taken as the object. Thus when the philosopher at the fifth state starts his actual search for the subjectivity of the self not by the thinking but in a meditational process, it's quite normal and not a tragic story to find only the void, nothing, there.
--- note by cloma.
If we take this "the one who is aware" as a mirror, what EO is saying might be easier to understand.
Any object can be reflected by a mirror, but not the mirror itself.
This is what happens at first four states.
A mirror trying to reflect itself will find nothing on the reflective surface at the fifth state.
--- end
If the subjectivity has solid existence as thought, emotion, memory, it can be taken as on object.
Since the pure subjectivity in the true sense cannot be known as an object but only by "matching", it is limited to the sixth state to have no lag.
In other words, only those who has came to total mental halt can live the pure subjectivity not as an object of observation. And then, a mystic is born out of the philosopher.
Now, not by taking it as an object, but to know the subjectivity by "matching" can be well suggested in the description by Bernadette Roberts. Though the terms and the expressions are quite different from the original translated text, it can be summarized as following.
(Ref. The Experience of No-Self, Bernadette Roberts, SUNY ISBN 0-7914-1694-1)
--- Translator's Note: Following text is written by Bernadette Roberts first, then translated into Japanese, then summarized by EO with his own terminology, and finally I translated it back into English. It could be interesting to find the original text and compare by yourself.
The term "Satori" is employed in the sense on "The Unknown Unknowable".
It is not used as customary sense of "preview of, or partial death of self".
Unless you had at least small preview, it doesn't make any difference though.
---
This manuscript is made of lines hand picked by EO from his previous books.
It is intended to be carried around as if it was the guide book for those who practice the Death Zen method arranged by him.
If you want to wonder in the TAO,
wonder never assuring if one is alive or dead.
You live and die every moment. So, make sure nothing.
* * * * * * * * *
All the identification of the self is a dream.
Any claim about the self, like, " I am such and such. ", is just a thought.
* * * * * * * * *
There is nothing you can really do. If you give up all your mind in the insight of no capability, you would loose all your hope and start doing nothing. When this goes deeper down to the abyss of minutes after minutes, meditation is there.
* * * * * * * * *
I have repeated again and again. It is not the " Addition ".
Subtraction. Zen and Tao's like are absolutely Subtraction.
* * * * * * * * *
The peace of the mind in TAO is just the absence of fear.
It is not the product of thoughts and beliefs,
based on the delusion of eternal existence of the soul.
* * * * * * * * *
--- More to be translated. ---
The death cannot be fought against. Things people claim to fight are nothing more than " the phenomenon of the life that may lead to the death ".
* * * * * * * * *
Cognition is not an expansion, but the " delimiter ". Out of your limited world of the cognition, the world does not exist for you. Things like "World" exists only in the limited cognition.
* * * * * * * * *
"Where" the hell do you become happy or unhappy? "Where" are those feelings happening?
Where is the real "spot"? It's all alone, in your consciousness.
Why am i sitting there?
The true answer for this question can't be other than "I am practicing dying".
* * * * * * * * *
Even though a man could be enlightened in the dangerous situation, keep in mind that the silence just like a death, rather than the danger, gave birth to many buddhas.
* * * * * * * * *
What was the work, the search?
It is unnecessary, searching for something special, to be completely done with all the unnecessities, till being undeniably clear how unnecessary it was all along. It is all about the work.
Just relax mindlessly, and move mindlessly. The buddha nature is just that.
The long journey to receive the insight, that was all, only that is worthwhile, is the question, the search.
* * * * * * * * *
Now, I understand very well why there are only few enlightened being among hundreds of Zen monasteries and temples in Japan.
Indeed, the enlightenment is not really needed yet.
Nobody is desperate enough for that.
* * * * * * * * *
The true search is born only when you face the existence in the desert all by yourself.
It is the match, "You alone VS universe".
* * * * * * * * *
People who imagine about the multiplicity, the vastness, never really shuts up. Moreover, they keep discussing about the eternity and the expansion all life long. But those who doesn't image, those who truly "meet" them, just drop into silence. Because feeling them directly will pull your consciousness. Utterly wordless. There is nothing to say, then.
* * * * * * * * *
Go to break and to destroy all the questioning and the enlightenment in the darkness.
* * * * * * * * *
* To be translated later